The conclusion of a major lawsuit brings an end to a
controversial period for social media company X. In recent months, the platform
had come under fire after various reports emerged highlighting concerning
trends in hateful and abusive speech in the aftermath of Elon Musk's
acquisition of the company.
One of the most high-profile reports was released by the
Center for Countering Digital Hate (C.C.D.H.), an organization focused on
monitoring and researching online harms. Their analysis of data from X's
network found substantial increases in certain types of slurs targeting Black
and transgender people in particular in the period immediately following Musk
taking operational control.
The C.C.D.H. published their findings in a report in
December 2022. It claimed to show clear evidence that hateful terms had seen
spikes of over 500% in some cases. They asserted this was directly linked to
laxer moderation and enforcement of the platform's rules under its new
leadership and ownership structure.
Additional reports from other groups in early 2023 continued
to raise questions. One highlighted examples of rule-breaking tweets from
high-profile users, including those with X's new "blue tick"
subscription service, not being addressed. Another report focused on how tweets
containing LGBTQ+ slurs alongside terms like "grooming" were also
remaining visible despite policies against hateful conduct.
In response to these reports and claims, X launched legal
action against the C.C.D.H. specifically. In a statement, the company asserted
that the reports and data presented were "false and misleading" and
accused the non-profit of actively working to damage relationships with
advertisers and cut off funding through misinformation.
However, the legal proceedings did not progress as X had
hoped. Earlier this month, a federal judge dismissed the entire lawsuit, ruling
against X's claims. In a strongly-worded judgment, the judge suggested it was
clear the intent behind the litigation was simply to punish and attempt to
intimidate the C.C.D.H. for their research and transparency around platform
governance issues.
The judge noted there was no substantial legal basis or
merit to X's arguments. They made it clear the lawsuit appeared to be little
more than a tactic to threaten and discourage further independent analysis of
X's policies and practices. This outcome is seen by free speech and online
safety advocates as an important stand against such attempts to stifle scrutiny
through legal posturing.
So in the end, after months of allegations around lax
moderation enabling harmful speech to spread more widely, X has been forced to
drop its case against those drawing attention to the issues. As the debate
around content governance on major social platforms continues, transparency and
accountability will remain key priorities for many.
If you're looking for an easy and powerful way to manage
multiple social profiles for your business or clients, be sure to check out
Great SMM. As a leader in the industry with an intuitive smm panel, their
full-service social media marketing solutions have helped thousands of brands
improve engagement, grow audiences and boost sales.